🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension sparked by the introduction of a new comprehensive peace framework for achieving ceasefire appeared – momentarily – to have been contained. A senior US official spoke of "notable headway" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its response: an extensive attack of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Negotiation and Warfare

The succession of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the current period. By day, political struggles are conducted: optimistic declarations are released from various governments. Immense energy is expended on managing particular approaches. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the primary tool for achieving "peace".

After-Dark Attacks

As the offensive developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's defenselessness was laid bare. Ukraine is equipped to monitor projectile deployments from enemy soil, a ability afforded by up-to-date information. From witness perspectives, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to engage hostile guided weapons streaked across the sky – sophisticated military planes delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons engaged: several firings targeted at a incoming threat. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, probably delivered by Western nations. Every firing shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly becomes grim resignation: maybe the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a automatic firearm fired at a aerial vehicle somewhere nearby, part of a rapid response unit – probably imported technology. Unfortunately, the shots failed to hit the opposing UAV – it maintained course toward its objective.

With pauses, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv faced the morning news: several casualties, devastation and infrastructure problems in many homes as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those 24 hours illustrated Ukraine's vital need on international aid – a dependence that European nations are evidently unprepared to replace in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The 28-point plan from Washington generated strong feelings, discussion and serious worry – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new approach from American administration follows the consistent cycle: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, manages to fend off. They manage the tension but never actually achieve victory. This trend will, undoubtedly, continue.

Political Considerations

It is easy to blame specific actors of repeatedly advocating Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership works based on a principle well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have been unable to protect through force. The White House presumes that it is unfeasible to compel Moscow to abandon the land that it currently occupies in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does nothing to prevent Kremlin actions, through words or deeds, from believing that the status quo will not shift further in its favour in the near future.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Russian leadership is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its allies are nearing depletion. Their incentive to agree to terms that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is almost completely absent. There may be multiple initiatives to stop fighting, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still hold out, gradually sacrificing people and territory but preventing a total frontline collapse until situations evolve in its favour.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no genuine requirements for a ceasefire. Now, personal considerations are coming into play: personal goals to negotiate peace and secure international recognition, and Kyiv's twin challenges – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the country's interests against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their attention does not move to homefront challenges. And although their task will now be much harder after recent developments, it remains highly unlikely that this will change their overall approach.

These opposing factors are influencing discussions.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to eliminate the proposed articles of the current initiative. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, pushback by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with soothing efforts of negotiators, and finally, recent disclosures, all achieved their purpose.

While new plans based on previous concepts are approaching, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter political attacks from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and reflect specific hesitation to alter the situation, if they maintain solidarity and improve their protective measures at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the predictable period, primarily depend on continued Western support.